[HAM] 145 vs. 142Warren Seale b3boy2000 at yahoo.comThu Jun 19 11:17:01 CDT 2003
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hi Scott, Just wanted to get clarification on tall vs short. The 142 is the short version of the147 and the 145 is the short version of the 122? Is this right? I've always used and owned 122s so I'm curious. Thanks! W Scott Hawthorn <organfreak at donobi.net> wrote:At 08:37 PM 5/20/2003, HOlsen5629 at aol.com wrote: >Also, the 142 was an afterthought and somewhat of a late arrival. CBS >already had 122 amps and 145 cabinets, it was just a matter of mating the two >and assigning a model number. There were no Model 142s when the 122 and 145 >were introduced in 1963. I too, would love to have a nice pair of 142s. >They are great Leslies, plus the "short" (33") cabinet is "tighter" and >easier to record. Thank you Harv, Good stuff. I didn't know that! -Scott -- Subscription Options/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.zeni.net/hf/ Hammond-Leslie FAQ: http://theatreorgans.com/hammond/faq/ HammondWiki: http://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
More information about the hammond mailing list |