[HAM] Apologize what?kai lammervo tonecab at yahoo.comMon Aug 21 08:49:28 CDT 2006
>I wonder if Kai is ready to apologize to Mike and the other techs he has >insulted by accusing them of "withholding" information. It's outrageous. Apologize what? For somebody being so "cocksure" wrong? I can´t accuse anybody "withholding" information if they really didn´t know something. In that case I apologize! Organfreak <scott195 at centurytel.net> wrote: > No, I did not know that. I am checking and will remain open to this claim, > which until now, I had never heard before. I'll tell you right now, I >don't > believe it. Mr. Fulk? Care to comment? ...And M.Fulk replied: >This is absolutely untrue Was that about later resonance-circuits? Hmm... Let´s see who is right... It was this I lost my temper in the first place: >I would not pay $.25[cents] for a recapped oegan; I wonder how many people >would. >Fulk > There are probably people who can do recap-job right who really wonder this kind of stupid statement from highly respected tech. If the job is done right you don´t even realize the TG is recapped until you lift the TG felt cover! I´m really grateful for Kon Z. for information that helped me restore my A100. It´s been "field tested" now few times with no complains. Quite contrary, a lot of compliments! I´ve had chance to listen it played by few world famous bands in front of 10 000 people, and now I feel comfortable to let it mature naturally. K.L --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
More information about the hammond mailing list |