[HAM] FW: New Hammond Factory Sound / Recapping etc. PART 2Kon Zissis kziss at ozemail.com.auSat Nov 25 19:38:05 CST 2006
Hi everyone. My big post seems to have been automatically chopped and it did not appear properly on Hammond zeni so therefore I will try sending the rest of it in two more smaller parts.--Kon ===================================================== New Hammond Factory Sound / Recapping etc. PART 2 Ian Hooper wrote: >.105, or .255 mfd implies are lot closer tolerance than 20%. Maybe the rules of the game were different back then, but >when I spec parts for production, .1 mfd and .105 mfd are most definitely not the same animal, the latter being a %5 >or better part. Maybe it's time to open up the whole 'ESR' can of worms again :) In such low >impedance circuits, certainly a factor to be considered. Paul Peters wrote: >Hammond used four when checking caps. That means the 20% tolerance no >longer applies. This whole cap check was to gain higher tolerances. STOP using >that 20% in any speculations.
More information about the hammond mailing list |