[HAM] New Hammond Factory Sound / Recapping etc. PART 3Kon Zissis kziss at ozemail.com.auSat Nov 25 19:45:39 CST 2006
Here is the final part of the big post that I tried to send but it was automatically chopped--Kon ============================== New Hammond Factory Sound / Recapping etc. PART 3 Brad Baker wrote: >All this stuff about cap matching and tolerances and procedures in the factory is almost meaningless if in the Hammond >factory the Tone Generators were calibrated after the caps were installed... The tonal balance is done primarily by >the TG calibration. Having a proper filter center frequency will perhaps make the calibration procedure easier, or >more consistent from unit to unit. A mistuned filter might affect harmonic content or noise >level associated from a >tone, but not the tone level in a calibrated TG. Yes , regardless of how strictly perfectly or less than perfectly the capacitors were matched to the transformer coil filters at the factory, the TG was calibrated to produce the overall TG curve after these capacitors were put in place. I do not think that the harmonic content from a slightly mistuned filter would be very noticeable especially considering that the waveform from a filter with an aged wax capacitor can still sound acceptable even though the noise level and the extra harmonic content is a little more noticeable along with the very noticeable decreased output level. The problem that can happen with recapping is that if the new capacitor is more exactly matched to the transformer coil filter than what the original wax capacitor was, then that TG note will end up a little louder than what it should be but this can be rectified by recalibrating the TG as you mentioned. I understand however that other people will not be willing or able to recalibrate their TG. >(It doesn'tmake much sense for them to be calibrated *before* the caps were >installed). If this was done then the TG output levels would have ended up all over the place and they would have needed to be readjusted in order to produce a smooth output curve. >One approach to fixing a dull organ might be a TG recalibration. If such an organ were one with badly mistuned >filters with wax caps whose values were 200% of the stock values then it may not be possible to calibrate that TG >without installing new caps. The new caps would approximately center the filter response on each associated tone, and >would provide an increase in the adjustable tone level thereby. If the wax caps are not too far gone , the weak TG notes can be recalibrated but a problem with doing this is that the pickup might need to be set too close to the tone wheel thus resulting in a dirtier sounding waveform with more noise and possibly a warbling tone as well. If the TG is recapped properly then you can get a slightly louder than stock TG output curve but still with pure sounding waveforms. The louder than stock TG output curve but still with pure sounding sine waves is especially possible if the organ is a late 60's or early 70's red mylar capped organ with the R/C filters and the bright red enamelled wire on the transformer coil filter bobbins because these transformer coils produce louder output levels than the early 1960's transformer coils with the dark brown enamelled wire. I have verified this with my own 1962 C3 after I transplanted the red mylar caps and transformer coil filters brass tray from a 1970 T-300 into my C3 and I transplanted the recapped transformer coil filters brass tray into the T-300. \ The reason why I transplanted the red mylar caps tray from the T-300 into my C3 was because the red mylar caps are still more or less properly matched to the transformer coils thus ending any issues with mismatched capacitors. I had originally replaced the wax caps from my 1962 C3 with new capacitors , many of which produced the peak filter outputs so therefore I expected that the red mylar caps tray originally from the T-300 would produce a slightly mellower TG output curve in my C3 but on the contrary the TG output levels of the TG notes 49 to 91 were now noticeably louder and conversely the output levels of the TG notes 49 to 91 in the T-300 become noticeably lower with the recapped brass tray originally from my 1962 C3. The T-300 originally had very high treble levels with a resulting nasal thin sound but I had recalibrated the whole TG to produce a typical B3 / C3 etc output curve but with a warmer bass and lower midrange whilst the red mylar caps tray was still in the T-300. After I transplanted the recapped tray from my C3 into the T-300 , the output curve of the TG notes 49 to 91 became almost a straight line instead of the typical upward rising curve of the B3 / C3 etc , and this made the T-300 sound quite nice and fat so therefore I decided to leave the TG curve it as it is without recalibrating it a second time in order to bring back the typical B3 / C3 upward rising curve. All the best. Kon END OF PART 3
More information about the hammond mailing list |