[HAM] New Hammond Factory Sound / Recapping etc. PART 2 - A One more attempt to post thisKon Zissis kziss at ozemail.com.auSat Nov 25 23:32:59 CST 2006
Hi everyone. Again my last attempt to post the Part 2-A of my post was unsuccessful because only the quotes from Ian Hooper and Paul Peters appeared but my own text did not appear. I suspect that it has something to do with the fact that I had forwarded it from the original post whilst deleting the parts 1 , parts 2B and parts 3 but the grey bar on the right side of the Microsoft Outlook page was still very small thus giving the false impression that this is a very large post so perhaps the Hammond zeni server automatically deleted the text because it interpreted the post to be too large even though the text is in fact a lot less than what it originally was and the rest of the space was blank. Now for the last time I am sending the Part 2 A of my post but this time I have copied and pasted it on to a new email page on Microsoft Outlook. Let's see if this works .--Kon ================================================= New Hammond Factory Sound / Recapping etc. PART 2 - A Ian Hooper wrote: >.105, or .255 mfd implies are lot closer tolerance than 20%. Maybe the >rules of the game were different back then, but >when I spec parts for >production, .1 mfd and .105 mfd are most definitely not the same >animal, the latter being a %5 >or better part. Maybe it's time to open >up the whole 'ESR' can of worms again :) In such low impedance >circuits, certainly a factor to be considered. The ESR is another factor to consider but I am not sure how this actually affects the output levels of the TG notes . From what I have read , the wax caps had higher ESR than the modern capacitors so therefore it would be very interesting to compare the output levels readings if a brand new wax cap with high ESR and a new modern capacitor with low ESR but that both capacitors have an EXACT identical mfd value were tested on TG note filters throughout the various frequencies in the TG notes 49 to 91 range. Has anyone done this or can anyone explain how the ESR factor affects the output levels or the resonance factor of the filter ? Paul Peters wrote: >Hammond used four when checking caps. That means the 20% tolerance no >longer applies. This whole cap check was to gain higher tolerances. STOP using >that 20% in any speculations.
More information about the hammond mailing list |