[HAM] Rudy's C-3 Rant - was, Single louverjoe d joedoria at hotmail.comWed Apr 4 15:54:39 CDT 2007
I wonder if this is truth but i read once RVG would take a direct out of the organ and two mics on the top in the center (not on each side for wider spread). Can anyone confirm this? >From: OF <scott195 at centurytel.net> >Reply-To: The Hammond Forum <hammond at zeni.net> >To: The Hammond Forum <hammond at zeni.net> >Subject: [HAM] Rudy's C-3 Rant - was, Single louver >Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:33:40 -0700 > >At 03:20 AM 4/4/2007, Kon Zissis wrote: > >The Rudy Van Gelder 1959 C3 is probably one of the most famous Hammonds > >in the world and for the Jazz / Blues lovers the sound of this 1959 C3 >[snip] > >If I ever get to the United States and I am ever given permission to > >check out this 1959 C3 , I would measure the TG output curve and then > >put the data in my TG spreadsheet for all to see. After doing this then > >it might then be my turn to duck and run like hell because a few > >elitist purists who are offended that the "magic" of this 1959 C3 is now > >publicly revealed will want to grab me and slap my face and kick my > >backside :-). > >Kon, >There is no "magic" in that organ. It's all in the recording process. It's >a fairly ordinary C-3. Pardon me for continuing to harp on this, but maybe >I'm slightly stung by this "elitist purist" thing. Maybe the shoe fits, >maybe I'll wear it. And it's obvious to me who else you're referring to-- >someone who has been inside the studio and is intimately familiar with the >organ. You misconstrue that person's motives. It is not the revelation of >any TG curves that offends anyone, it's the idea that this makes much >difference at all, in the end. On top of that, the possible variables >involved in making such measurements from one organ to the next are many, >even without taking into account all the other possible variables from one >setup to the next. > >The people who have made famous recordings on that organ, people like >Jimmy, Ray Charles, etc. etc., are master players, and their taste and >techniques, coupled with Rudy's superb recording, are what make the records >sound so good. Even a simple but gigantic variable like where do you set >the expression pedal makes a ton of difference in the tone. Notice that all >of these guys get a different sound out of that same organ. It's the way >they play. I could ID McDuff playing that organ in three notes. I wish I >could pose an experiment, but it can't be done. I would put my C-3, or my >B-3, or practically any console in there and make the same recordings. They >would sound just about the same and I would collect my $1,000 bet! > >I know there are legions of people who are fascinated by these TG curves >and I know it's an interesting hobby for you, but my perspective needs to >be in there too: my viewpoint is that the real magic is in the PLAYING and >the RECORDINGS. The old song, "It Ain't the Meat, It's the Motion" is >totally apt here. Most women already know this. > > > > > > >-- >Subscription Options/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.zeni.net/hf/ >Hammond-Leslie FAQ: http://theatreorgans.com/hammond/faq/ >HammondWiki: http://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/ >hammond at zk3.dec.com archives: http://zk3.hammondforum.com/ > _________________________________________________________________ MSN is giving away a trip to Vegas to see Elton John. Enter to win today. http://msnconcertcontest.com?icid-nceltontagline
More information about the hammond mailing list |