[HAM] Speakers and frequencies .. what's it all aboutKon Zissis kziss at ozemail.com.auThu Dec 27 21:12:44 CST 2007
Hi Benjamin. Thank you for your reply and the crossover calculation link. Judging by the replies that I have received about this , It looks like the best option is to replace the stock 925 amplifiers and power supply with a new power supply and a new high power stereo amplifier that can safely be used as a biamped stereo amplifier with an active in line crossover or in the bridged configuration . I understand that the active in-line crossovers are used in a biamped system in order to minimise inter modulation distortion especially in very high quality hi fi systems , however in the real world application of Leslie speakers, the Leslie 122 , 147 etc which have passive crossovers still sound great and my own modified Leslie 122 that I often use with an external solid state amplifier still has the stock Leslie 800 Hz crossover ( but I have replaced the original old capacitors with new polypropylene capacitors of the correct stock specs ) and this Leslie 122 which has the JBL 2482 treble driver in it ( which is the same treble driver as that in the Leslie 925 ) and my this Leslie 122 sounds better than my friend's stock Leslie 925. Even though there is a passive crossover , there is no noticeable problem with inter modulation distortion. As well as that , I did an experiment to see if the stock Leslie 122 passive crossover causes any volume level loss . I disconnected the speaker wires from the crossover and I then joined the bass speaker and the treble driver directly together in parallel and I then fed the direct audio signal from the power amplifier to the speakers and there was hardly any noticeable difference in the volume levels of the sound so therefore it appears that the stock Leslie 122 / 147 crossover is of a decent design that does not produce a noticeable signal loss. Because my own Leslie 122 with the JBL 2482 treble driver and the passive crossover and an external solid state amplifier sounds better than my friend's biamped Leslie 925 , I decided that it would be a good idea to replace the old and primitive quality stock biamped 925 amplifier with a new high power amplifier and a passive crossover similar to how the stock Leslie crossovers are wired up. The tech Bruce Wahler of Ashby Solutions told me that he also prefers to use mono high power amplifiers with passive crossovers in his customized high power Leslies. Because the Leslie 925 has a 4 ohms speaker , I would have to change the inductor value in order to take into account the 4 ohms. If my friend does decide to replace the stock 4 ohms speaker with an 8 ohms speaker , then I could just use the same passive crossover component values as that of the stock Leslie 122 crossover ( 5.2 milli Henry inductor and 12.5 uf capacitor for the bass speaker and 3.2 milli henry inductor and 7.8 uf capacitor for the treble driver ) because I used to have an 8 ohms bass speaker in my modified Leslie 122 with the solid state amplifier , and the impedance mismatch did not cause any frequency response gap or adversely affect the sound quality in any other way. Apparently if an 8 ohms bass speaker is used , then a lower crossover frequency is sent to the treble driver but this is not a problem with my Leslie 122 because the JBL 2482 can safely go down to around 300 Hz at 120 watts RMS . I understand that if you are using the stock Leslie 122 / 147 amplifier then both the bass speaker and the treble driver need to be 16 ohms in order to not damage the output transformer. All the best. Kon -----Original Message----- From: benjamin [mailto:benjaminmassy at hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, 28 December 2007 6:47 AM To: kziss at ozemail.com.au; hammond at zeni.net Cc: benjaminmassy at hotmail.com Subject: Speakers and frequencies .. what's it all about Hello Kon , Very nice to find somebody who respects good music-reproduction within our fysical limits of hearing . Me to, I am leaving the scene if it is to loud and the risk of eardamage is to high . Now about your your Bi amped 925 project : First of all the passive 12 db slope is a problem to make with coils and caps between the amp output and the speakers , why , because the coils and caps you need are loosing a lot of power since they will have to pass high currents and these components do have an internal resistor that you will have to take in account . plus for 12 db slope you need a lot of coils and caps .... in short : to much for what the results will be . Also it will put a difficult load on your amps since part of it is capacitive load and the other part is an inductive load combined with the speaker impedance , it could give unpredictable results in some cases..even burning out your amp by oscilation and if it is supersonic oscilation you will not even notice it unless you have attached an osciloscope to see what happens; in short an amp is build for a certain application and a certain load that is matched to it ; second point : the gain by doubling the power output is only 3 dB louder theoretically , practically there will be no noticable gain here if you take into account the losses you will have by the passive components between speakers and amp third point ; do you know why speakersystems are split up in active systems ? mainly because of to avoid DISTORTION , the distortion that you get is the mixing product of different frequencies and is called intermodulation distortion , I give you an example: if you have two frequencies entering an amp like 100 HZ and 2000 HZ ; since no amp is completely linear in amplification there will be produced mix frequencies and they will be the 2000 Hz minus 100 Hz thus 1900 Hz and also the 2000 Hz plus the 100 Hz thus 2100 Hz so your amp will produce at the speaker not only 100 and 2000 Hz but also 1900Hz and 2100 Hz plus the harmonics from these frequencies .. if you have only harmonical distortion you have not a big problem since the harmonics are sounding ok ( every octave is the double from the one that sounds lower so harmonic distortion is not a bad thing that it will give you an ugly sound) , but the Intermodulation products from the intermodulation distortion , These are very bad in the ear ! unless you like that sound , but most people don't like it ; so to avoid these bad distortions , music systems are split up in active frequency splitted amps and speakersystems ... that is the whole secret .. If you are going to distroy this principle you will always have a bad or worse reproduction then the original and in this case practically no gain , or marginally in sound production .. the distortion is mostly in the end or power amplification , it is rarely in a preamp since preamps have to deal with low power low voltage signals , but in the high voltage , high current portion of the final amps , there is what you get from distortion due to non linear behaviour of the circuits ; If your friend wants to make it sound louder then let him buy a second 925 instead of spoiling his system that he owns now . or buy a tuneable active preamp splitsystem that is used in caraudio and put more powerful amps in the 925 , but DON'T try to filter after the amp.. this is the wrong way of doing ; I give you here some calculations and a bit of insight about speakerfiltering on this link http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:lx2-F3scZOIJ:www.bcae1.com/passxovr .htm+passive+crossover+filter+calculation <http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:lx2-F3scZOIJ:www.bcae1.com/passxov r.htm+passive+crossover+filter+calculation&hl=nl&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=be> &hl=nl&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=be So dear friend Kon , I am sorry for my bad English , but I tried to explain you and some other non technical people what it all is about . Hope it helps you and some other people . all the best from Belgiums Benjamin ( and yes 16 Hz is a revelation to feel in the belly and to let it blow away your pants ) :-))
More information about the hammond mailing list |