[HAM] New B-3 Questions (was why are tonewheels superior?)

bvb2b3 bvb2b3 at insightbb.com
Sat Feb 3 15:08:49 CST 2007


It's been a couple years since I last played a New B-3 and I've forgotten some of it's details.  Could someone elaborate on what "dial-in" tone adjustment is available on the New B-3?

As I recall reading about the New B-3 when introduced, it was said to be able to sound like almost any tonewheel, from the Model A to a late B-3.  What capability did that mean besides adjusting the foldback (or having no foldback) and having 2 or 3 overall tone selections with names resembling something like "brite", "b-3 type", etc. to choose from?

Has anyone tried adjusting a New B-3 to sound like a BC or other tonewheel besides a B-3, and been able to really duplicate it?

Thanks.
Bill


Message: 35
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:44:48 -0800
From: OF <scott195 at centurytel.net>
Subject: Re: [HAM] why are tonewheels superior?
To: The Hammond Forum <hammond at zeni.net>
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20070202094218.02de6490 at 209.206.160.251>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed;
x-avg-checked=avg-ok-1A981066

At 03:35 PM 2/1/2007, joe d wrote:

>Yeah, I should have clarified a bit better.  Does that make sense though
>(real organ variances vs. the new b-3)?

Not really, since you can dial-in just about any tone you want an a New 
B-3.  <snip>


More information about the hammond mailing list

Hosted by zeni.net