[HAM] why are tonewheels superior?Phil Glatz phil at glatz.comWed Jan 31 13:55:34 CST 2007
> >The tonewheels generate sinusoidal waves, which are free > >of harmonics and as pure as you can get. > >There's where you went wrong. Nothing could be further from the truth. So the output is not a pure sine wave? I always heard the Hammond system was based on additive synthesis, based on Fourier's analysis of adding multiples of harmonics of a pure tone. The tonewheel circuitry uses filters to remove harmonics, trying to get as close to harmonic-free fundamentals. And the synchronous motor guarantees an extremely constant frequency. >By the same token any computer based workstation keyboard should sound >much better than my 1905 Steinway which hits these long metal... Apples and oranges - the Steinway is designed to create sounds mechanically, while a computer keyboard is designed to trigger a switch. The objective of the tonewheels is to create pure fundamental tones that can be added in various proportions to create more complex sounds. My question was that since the idea is to create a pure tone to begin with, why should it make a difference how it was created. And please don't get me wrong; I meant no disrespect to the classic Hammond organs. I have backgrounds both in music and engineering, and have been crazy about traditional and electronic instruments most of my life. I've always considered the late-fifties Hammonds the ultimate in electrical/electronic instruments because of their soulful expressiveness and very high standards of quality. I'd take a B-3 or A-100 over anything created since without thinking twice. My question was a theoretical one; assuming the sounds are created with pure tones, why would it matter how they are created? Are the ones from tonewheels somehow purer - or do they have some slight imperfections that make for a richer sound? Assuming everything else is equal, what difference would you detect if you were to slip some high-quality oscillators in place of a tonewheel generator? I'm not saying new is always better; I much prefer my IBM computer keyboard fro8 1984 to anything more modern. It was simply better engineered.
More information about the hammond mailing list |