[HAM] I'm With HimMagnus Enorson magnus at musicastrana.comMon Jul 2 15:59:53 CDT 2007
Bill Odum wrote: > I had an M3 that I chopped. I played on the road for several years moving the M3 frequently. I chopped it and believe me it was a hell of a lot easier to move and much better on my back. First of all, I wish to state that I'm all for chopping spinets if one wants to. It's all a matter of whether one is ready to compromise or not - I can only speak for myself, but I find that I play about ten times better when I'm sitting behind a real, unharmed instrument. I guess it's a vibe thing. But as always opinions differ and if someone wants to do a chop - well fine by me. That said - I fail to see how chopping an organ can be easier on someone's back? When you chop a spinet you only lose about 2 or 3 kilos worth of wood - all the weighty stuff is still in there; the manuals topping the list of course. The biggest difference between moving a chop and a stock organ, is that with the chop you have to bend all the way to the floor to pick up the darned thing, then carry it - while a stock organ is going to be on dollies and so require very little lifting at all. And when lifting occurs the handles are at a very convenient, back-saving height... /Magnus
More information about the hammond mailing list |