[HAM] I'm With Him

[John Brevik]

Joe,

First, I apologize for my STUPID word choice. "Evil" was an absurd  
thing to write, and I regret it.

Second, I respect your opinion and don't think it's immature. I do  
think that at times you have responded with unnecessarily  
inflammatory and insulting language, and that's what I was referring to.

Third, please don't put words in my mouth -- I am not endorsing all  
of John's postings by any means -- as I posted earlier, . I did stand  
up for John's integrity as a businessman, but I find his tone off- 
putting quite often.

Best regards,

John

On Jul 1, 2007, at 11:08 PM, joe d wrote:

>>>> Now, tell me why I'm evil.<<<
>
> Wow,  i'm not sure where you're even at here.  You're evil...truely  
> "EVIL"?
> Did I or anyone say you're evil?
> Maybe re-read some of that again: "they don't make them anymore so  
> let's try
> and keep them intact".  If, to you, that translates to "you are  
> evil" then..
> i guess...you're evil (?).
> Go get that looked at.
>
>>> I had an A100 in really nice condition and was playing out with  
>>> it. I
>> still remember the sick feeling I had in the pit of my stomach the
>> first time it got a pretty good ding in it -- which seems to be
>> inevitable when you're moving it all the time. I then LUCKED into the
>> opportunity to make a good professional chop out of it<<
>
> "Lucked" - LOL!
> Sorry, never quite heard it put that way before.  How much did the  
> luck cost
> btw? just curious.
>
> So, now the orig cabinet resides in a hermedically sealed vault or
> something?...or is it really more likely sitting in a garage with a  
> blanket
> on it? (we all know garages are impervious to objects
> scratching/rubbing/spilling/etc. on it).
>
> re-read again if need be: an organ orig and intact in nearly ANY  
> condition
> (even beat to all get out) is more valid and worthy than a chop  
> imo.  Sort
> of akin to the clone, you aren't really playing the Hammond on a  
> chop imo.
> There's more to it than "the organ sound"  (I'm sorry if you don't  
> see how
> or wish to agree just the same though).
>
>
>> I also gotta laugh at that last paragraph, even though it's not aimed
>> at me. There's plenty of immature to go around in this thread!
>
> Is it immature to state the fact that they are not made anymore and  
> let's
> try and keep the orig around and intact at all costs (or
> partially-to-completely refurbish to taste or if at all applicable)?
> Really?
>
> And it's NOT immature for some person to insert his name/business  
> directly
> into the topic...and proceed to bite-back half-cocked, complete  
> with snide
> remarks?  Have I got that right?
>
> Have we entered bizzaro-world?
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get a preview of Live Earth, the hottest event this summer - only  
> on MSN
> http://liveearth.msn.com?source=msntaglineliveearthhm
>
> --
> Subscription Options/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.zeni.net/hf/
> Hammond-Leslie FAQ: http://theatreorgans.com/hammond/faq/
> HammondWiki: http://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/
> hammond at zk3.dec.com archives: http://zk3.hammondforum.com/