[HAM] Answering John Haburay (ZZZZZ.......)

[Scott Hawthorn]

At 10:44 AM 6/21/2007, JOHN HABURAY wrote:
>Scott writes:
>   He also implied that if I was too stupid to not
>understand
>his typo, I shouldn't be working on Hammonds. Beyond offensive.
>
>   John Haburay writes:
>   Hold on! I did not imply anything. You saw what you wanted to see not 
> what I posted. I did not mention you Scott H. or your abilities or lack 
> of to repair Hammond organs, digital or analog. I never saw in your posts 
> any indication that you worked on Hammonds at all, and never considered 
> you a Hammond tech in any way, so I didn't say you weren't good at it. If 
> the shoe fits, slip it on, but I did not say that. As a matter of fact 
> there was absolutly nothing mentioned in that post about fixing Hammonds. 
> I thought your question was the typical reply to all posts no matter what 
> it is about, attempt at being funny and I merely tried to be funny back. 
> Don't flatter yourself and think it was about you. It wasn't. The post of 
> the question was directed at you only because you asked. The content was 
> not and if you read it again, it was a general statement. There is not 
> mention of you at all.
[snip]
>  Relax, enjoy some tea and have a nice dui.--John

Thanks, I do like tea. Here's the chain:

I asked you:What's a "giu"?
And you answered
>   A "giu" is a guy who doesn't understand a simple typo and I probably 
> wouldn't want too close to my Hammond. --John

*I* am the guy who didn't understand, remember? And I've made hundreds of 
technical posts here and talked about tech jobs I've done. Now you ask me 
to believe it wasn't directed at me. OK, whatever.