[HAM] "Save Ours Seas" New song by Dan BonowJohn Freund organguy at nj.rr.comSun Apr 27 21:29:40 CDT 2008
> Oh yeah. If you're saying that only now, you might have missed the > earlier-posted "Too Blue." Dan's miracle-drummer, brother Tim, is back! > <www.danbonow.com/public/TooBlue-3rdRoughmix.mp3> Gotta tell ya, that is an excellent "open" drum sound you got there. I could go for a little more definition in the kick drum (see below) but the drums are full and the brass has the necessary twinkle. Tell me about your mike choice and config. It sounds like either just overheads and kick (is the kick cheated to the left intentionally?) or maybe close mikes with well chosen room 'verb. Also the lead organ ain't the clone is it? > >A bit o' compression on the voc > More then? What sound are we looking for? I'm an amateur. I compressed it > only enough to keep it from red-lining. That's exactly what you want to do on the way in - if necessary. In mixing you're trying to get the vocal to sit in a consistent place within the track, but the trick is to do it with without crushing the dynamics of the performance or hearing the compression. With Dan's exaggerated style you might want to be a little more severe to even him out. Start with a fairly tame ratio (2 or 3:1) and drop the threshold a bit lower than you have it. If the louder bits start to sound "boxy" (this shit is impossible to describe - you'll learn to hear compression after you've used it a bit) raise the threshold a bit. If you're not getting the job done, boost the ratio. If you're crushing it too much you lose high end and the diction will start to sound mushy. Do yourself a favor and overdo it and twist the knobs so you can recognize the artifacts of compression. You can always turn it back or start over again. Attack is pretty easy to figure out but when you figure out the rules of sustain and release let me know because I'm still fumbling with that. > > and some subtractive EQ on the low mids/bass > >and yer in bizness. > > What kind of speakers are you listening on, John? The thing was thumpin' > until I switched to my Event studio monitors, at which point I had to > really boost the bass! Are you talking low-low, like ~60-80 Hz? He insists > on that being strong. Or above? Your feedback is always appreciated. I'm on my laptop so I'm using headmaphones. In general you want to be choosy about what you let occupy the low end. Most of the fighting between instruments in the low end is 180/200hz somewhere around there. Definitely notch that on the kick and you'll get some of your definition back, especially with the kind of kick sound you have. Again with the stupid descriptors - take out the boom to bring out the thump. And put high pass filtering on everything that is NOT tasked with the job of providing the low end for the mix - keys, vox, ESPECIALLY guitars. I don't profess expertise but I've done enough of it to have learned to recognize where the problems are and every so often I figure out how to fix them! As always with rules of thumb, prepare to throw them out if your instrumentation or performance is asking you to. If you like any of my mixes (and *I* don't always), I'll share with you that I have a tetris approach to eq - if the guitar really lives at a certain freq, then see if the other instruments can live without so much of that frequency. Once you start doing that you'll be amazed how much you can bring "up front" and still be able to hear it all. Little tricks like scooping the mids out of background vocals to bring out the lead...and so on...you'll discover (as I'm sure you have) your own little bits of wisdom. Hope any of this helps. /John
More information about the hammond mailing list |