[HAM] Depth-ness of the B3William Mark Bristow gfc at classicnet.netSat Jul 26 11:00:18 CDT 2008
Jim, Owning an XK-3 and various Leslies and a B3, B2, A-101 (in church ministries). Recently I had the opportunity to play an XK-3c system and the 3300. With a little tweaking of the 3300s controls, the rig sounds very much like a good B3. The 3300 is not quite the tube sound more like the High Power Bill Beer Leslies I own. The Ferro-fluid treble driver in the 3300 is more V-21 sounding than the JBL 2482 in the Beer Leslies. It is absolutely a good and workable sound. Like Scott said a few posts back, when youre playing with a full band most of the subtleties get lost in the wall of sound created by the band and what the audience hears is Hammond. Ive used my XK-3 with the Leslie 2101 and gone into the audience with another organist guesting on the XK. The sound is certainly a believable authentic Hammond.&nb sp; (We also use a Motion-Sound Pro-145 at times with the XK-3). Yet, sitting at the thing I miss the playing subtleties Im used to hearing on the B3 or the variants I own. On the one keyboard alone I certainly have to alter my playing style. The B3 puts out a much hotter signal than does the XK-3 which is why is must be lowered in volume. If your Bs gain control (a screw in the variable swell capacitor doghouse) has been turned up the signal may be very hot indeed. (Some rockers and jazz players turn the screw out from its factory about 1 and ½ turns to get more overdrive and growl to John Lord distortion at a stock Leslie and so they can fry up plenty of treble drivers.) When were in large venues for several days we often take my Bob Schleicher B3 portable especially if I am leading the band with the organ. If its a smaller venue, or Im just playing licks with a band then the Xk-3 and 2101 or Motion-Sound goes. Sometimes we fly the XK-3 and 2101 (in flight cases) costs about $100 per leg of the journey but often much cheaper than renting a B3 and Leslie. You know, part of playing is the acoustics of the venue. Even with the B3 and 2 Leslies, it takes me a couple of hours of playing to get the drawbar settings and eq (my Schleicher B3 has active treble and bass The Beer High Power Leslies also have treble volume adjustment) adjusted to exactly what I want to hear. With the XK-3 and 2101 or Pro-145 it usually takes me about a half days playing with the band to get the sound I want. Of course, the band and soundman is tweaking and eqing for half the day to get what he wants to hear. Venue acoustics have a huge impact on the sound in my experience. When I set the XK-3 and Pro-145 next to my stock 1952 B2 and stock 145 I can tweak the sound of the XK so that it sounds exactly like the B and 145 (which I love) and yet I dont like those settings at all when Im out in a Prison yard event under a giant tent with 1000 men and a full band and 3000 watts of high power sound reinforcement. You know, at 50 years of age, Im old enough to remember organists complaining when their favorite B or C failed at a gig and they had to use another players rig, or a rental. (And were talking apples to apples here, actual Tone-generated Hammonds and stock 122s or 145s) As Hammonds sound slightly different, it wasnt the same sound they were accustomed to with their own equipment. I recently read an interview of Joey D.s first time to hear Jimmy Smith. It wasnt even on a Hammond but a Wersi and the lower manual had failed, so Jimmy was having to compensate with his foot and any comps on the lower register of the upper manual. Yet, Joey described Jimmy s playing of that horrible instrument as incredible and was completely captivated. As Scott has posted previous that ability to make anything sound great is what makes a great player. Mark
More information about the hammond mailing list |