[HAM] RecappingDavid Anderson thermionic27609 at earthlink.netMon Mar 3 20:22:29 CST 2008
Kon, It's all good. We're all just trying to relearn what an electronics designer could have told us in 1954 :-) By the way, even if the capacitance of these paper units has only gone up 50%, I have found that dissipation factor has often increased 6 to 9 times, i.e., 600% to 900%, over what was typical for this type of capacitor when new. In simple terms, dissipation factor means there's now a resistor in the circuit that wasn't there to begin with, a resistor large enough to have a significant effect due to the low impedance of the TG circuits. David On Mar 3, 2008, at 8:34 PM, Kon Zissis wrote: > Hi David. > > Thank you for explaining that the main area of moisture absorption in > the wax caps was from the middle section where the leads are > connected. > I had assumed that the whole case of the wax caps absorbed moisture > thus > causing and that consequently the mfd value to drift up and that the > wax caps with the stiff cardboard outer cover would have had some > extra protection against moisture absorption. > > Your explanation that the middle part of the wax caps where the lead > goes through the wax is the weakest spot seems to throw out my > theory about wax caps with the stiff card board outer covers being > better preserved because the stiff outer card board tube does not > extend and cover the section where the two leads are connected to the > wax caps. >
More information about the hammond mailing list |